LAW ENFORCEMENT OF THEFT WITH VIOLENCE RESULTING IN DEATH BASED ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF JUSTICE

Authors

  • Alfian Widyatama Dirgantara Marshal Suryadarma University, Jakarta
  • Sujono Dirgantara Marshal Suryadarma University, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i1.504

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Theft, Justice

Abstract

Law enforcement must be carried out fairly and without discrimination in order to create justice and order in society. This study discusses law enforcement against the crime of theft with violence resulting in death based on Article 365 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, as well as an analysis of the legal considerations of judges in District Court Decision Number 33/Pid.B/2024/PN.Llg. The method used is normative juridical research with the approach of legislation and decision studies. The results showed that the perpetrator was sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of fifteen years as a form of fair law enforcement. The judge's consideration includes the fulfillment of the elements of the article charged, the demands of the public prosecutor, and the absence of reasons for criminal erasure. Law enforcement in the decision is in accordance with the principles of justice, certainty, and legal benefits. Therefore, law enforcement in the future must refer to the applicable rules of law in order to provide a deterrent effect, as well as protection and security for the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anshori, A. G., & Malian, S. (2017). Membangun hukum Indonesia: Kumpulan pidato guru besar ilmu hukum dan filsafat. Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Arief, B. N. (2012). Kebijakan hukum pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gulton, M. (2014). Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak (Cet. ke-4, revisi). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hartono, T. (2021). Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan (Studi pada Kepolisian Resor Kota Besar Medan). Jurnal Retentum, 2(1). https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/8172/4/BAB%20III.pdf

Ishaq. (n.d.). Sanksi pidana perampokan dalam KUHP dan hukum pidana Islam. http://repository.uinjambi.ac.id/70/1/Sanksi%20Pidana%20Perampokan%20....pdf

Isrok, & Birham, R. E. (2010). Citizen lawsuit (Cet. 1). Malang: UB Press.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). (n.d.).

Kurnia, L. C. (n.d.). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap kejahatan harta benda menurut Pasal 365 KUHP tentang pencurian dengan kekerasan. https://doi.org/10. (File lokal tidak dapat diakses, gunakan jika tersedia dari repositori daring)

Mulyadi, M. (2011). Politik hukum pidana: Bahan-bahan kuliah Fakultas Hukum. Sumatera Utara: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Nurhafifah, & Rahmiati. (2015). Pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan pidana terkait hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan putusan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kanun, 17(2).

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dalam jagat ketertiban. Jakarta: UKI Press.

Silfiyah, I., Harwika, D. M., & Palmasari, E. K. (2021). Peran kriminologi sebagai ilmu bantu hukum pidana (Studi kasus pembunuhan Cakung). Jurnal Court Review, 1(3).

Soekanto, S. (2008). Penanggulangan pencurian dengan kekerasan: Suatu tinjauan kriminologi. Jakarta: Aksara.

Sugandhi, R. (2007). KUHP dan penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Sunarso, S. (2004). Penegakan hukum dalam kajian sosiologis. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Syamsu, M. A. (2016). Penjatuhan pidana dan dua prinsip dasar penjatuhan pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-07

How to Cite

Widyatama, A., & Sujono. (2025). LAW ENFORCEMENT OF THEFT WITH VIOLENCE RESULTING IN DEATH BASED ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF JUSTICE. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i1.504