IMPLEMENTATION OF MONITORING AND INVESTIGATION RESULTS BY THE ROKAN HILIR REGENCY INSPECTORATE AUDITOR ON REGIONAL PROPERTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i1.475Keywords:
Monitoring and Investigation, Inspectorate Auditor, Regional-Owned AssetsAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the monitoring and investigation results by the Inspectorate Auditor of Rokan Hilir Regency on regional-owned assets, to analyze the obstacles in the implementation, and to analyze the efforts made to overcome those obstacles. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research findings, it is known that the implementation of the monitoring and investigation results by the Inspectorate Auditor of Rokan Hilir Regency on regional-owned assets has not been running optimally. This is evident from the discrepancies between audit findings and the corrective actions taken by the relevant Regional Government Organizations (OPD). Although some corrective measures have been initiated—such as updating inventory data, re-labeling items, and organizing asset documentation—these efforts are not yet evenly implemented across all OPDs and are not fully in accordance with the provisions of asset management as regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 47 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Bookkeeping, Inventory, and Reporting of Regional-Owned Assets. The obstacles in implementing the monitoring and investigation results include, first, from an administrative perspective, the presence of numerous assets without adequate supporting documents such as certificates, handover reports, or decisions determining the status of use. These assets frequently become recurring findings due to the lack of legal and physical verification. Second, from a technical perspective, some OPDs do not have dedicated personnel managing assets, resulting in the responsibility being handed to other staff members who lack relevant expertise. Third, challenges also arise from asset control by third parties. Efforts to overcome these obstacles include, first, reorganizing the asset documentation system and strengthening internal supervision.
Downloads
References
Adrian, S. (2012). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang & Jasa dan Berbagai Permasalahannya. Sinar Grafika.
Andrian, I., & Muchlis, M. (2017). Analisis Pengelolaan Aset Tetap Pemerintah Daerah Berdasar Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016. n.p.
Anggara, S. (2012). Ilmu Administrasi Negara: Kajian Konsep, Teori dan Fakta dalam Upaya Menciptakan Good Governance. Pustaka Setia.
Ardini. (2010). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Akuntabilitas Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA), 20(3), 111.
Arifin. (2010). Birokrasi Pemerintahan dan Perubahan Sosial Politik. Pustaka Refleksi.
Basuki, J. (2020). Administrasi Publik. Rajawali Press.
"Banyak Aset Dilaporkan Hilang, BPK Audit Inventaris Mess Pemkab Rohil." (n.d.). GoRiau.com. Retrieved July 28, 2025, from https://www.goriau.com/berita/baca/banyak-aset-dilaporkan-hilang-bpk-audit-inventaris-mess-pemkab-rohil.html
"Diduga Selewengkan Aset Daerah, Nama Afrizal Sintong dan Pejabat BPKAD Rohil Terseret." (n.d.). Wahana News. Retrieved July 29, 2025, from https://riau.wahananews.co/utama/diduga-selewengkan-aset-daerah-nama-afrizal-sintong-dan-pejabat-bpkad-rohil-terseret-IgjDrhICT3/2#post_wahana
Dwiyanto, A. (2008). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Habibi, A. M. (2010). Pengelolaan Aset Tetap (Barang Milik Daerah). n.p.
Hetifa, S. (2003). Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Indah, N. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penghapusan Barang Milik Daerah. Sinar Grafika.
Lotulung, P. E. (2012). Tata Kepemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance) Dalam Korelasinya Dengan Hukum Administrasi. In P. M. Hadjon et al., Hukum Administrasi dan Good Governance. Universitas Trisakti.
Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 19 of 2016 on Guidelines for the Management of Regional Property (Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah).
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Universitas Press.
Munaf, Y. (2016). Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Kota Pekanbaru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Peraturan Daerah Di Kota Pekanbaru. Marpoyan Tujuh.
Murhaini, S. (2014). Manajemen Pengawasan Pemerintahan Daerah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Murhaini, S. (2021). Manajemen Pengawasan Pemerintahan Daerah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Nurcholis, H. (2017). Teori dan Praktik Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah. Penerbit Grasindo.
Oktavia & Sumini. (2010). Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah. Graha Ilmu.
Pekei, B. (2020). Manajemen Efektivitas Pengelolaan Aset Daerah di Era Otonomi Daerah. Taushia.
Rahayu, A. S. (2017). Pengantar Pemerintahan Daerah: Kajian Teori, Hukum, dan Aplikasinya. Sinar Grafika.
Sangadji, M. E., & Sopiah. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian. CV Andi Offset.
Siregar, D. (2004). Manajemen Aset. Gramedia.
Soejito, I. (2021). Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryo, Y. (2021). Keuangan Di Era Otonomi Daerah. Penerbit Andi.
Tanjung, A. H. (2008). Penatausahaan Dan Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wahyu Rahmadani, Ardiansah, Andrizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
