LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PIMPS IN UNDERCOVER PROSTITUTION THROUGH "PLUS" MASSAGE PARLORS

Authors

  • Andra Ardan Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • M. Yusuf DM Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Rudi Pardede Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.461

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Clandestine Prostitution, Massage Parlors

Abstract

Clandestine prostitution through massage parlors in the jurisdiction of Polresta Pekanbaru exemplifies how social crimes have evolved over time by exploiting regulatory loopholes. This form of prostitution is concealed under the guise of legitimate massage or spa services, making it difficult for law enforcement agencies to detect. In reality, these services involve sexual activities managed by pimps. The aim of this study is to analyze law enforcement efforts against pimps involved in clandestine prostitution in massage parlors within the jurisdiction of Polresta Pekanbaru, to identify the obstacles hindering such enforcement, and to explore strategies to overcome these challenges. The research employs a sociological legal method. The findings indicate that law enforcement efforts in this context have not been fully effective. Although the police and related agencies have undertaken enforcement actions, prostitution under the cover of massage parlors continues to thrive. These establishments often offer hidden sexual services. Operators or pimps typically disguise these activities using coded language with regular clients or through closed digital communication networks. This demonstrates that pimps have developed more sophisticated and discreet operational systems that are difficult for law enforcement to detect directly. Several obstacles hinder effective law enforcement: First, massage parlors often continue operating covertly after being raided, simply by changing their business name, location, or service format. Second, the absence of consistent and routine monitoring by both law enforcement and regulatory agencies allows these operations to resume freely. Third, the lack of legal education and awareness programs at the community level contributes to public ignorance, making people less likely to participate in prevention or report prostitution-related activities. To overcome these challenges, several efforts are necessary. First, there must be strengthened administrative oversight and improved business licensing verification systems. Second, a joint task force comprising multiple government agencies should be established to conduct regular inspections and supervision of locations suspected of facilitating clandestine prostitution. Third, law enforcement and local governments should initiate community-based legal education programs, particularly in areas vulnerable to or near suspected prostitution sites.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eddyono, S. W. (2016). Perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan dalam praktik prostitusi. Jakarta: ICJR.

Gunadi, I. (2016). Cepat dan mudah memahami hukum pidana. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinergi.

Hius, J. J., Saputra, J., & Nasution, A. (2014, Mei 24). Mengenal dan mengantisipasi kegiatan cybercrime pada aktivitas online sehari-hari dalam pendidikan, pemerintahan dan industri serta aspek hukum yang berlaku. Prosiding SNIKOM 2014, Banda Aceh.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), Pasal 296, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981.

Moeljatno. (2009). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rizki, H. B., & Fathonah, R. (2014). Studi lembaga penegak hukum. Bandar Lampung: Justice Publisher.

Soedjono, D. (1982). Pathologi sosial. Bandung: Alumni.

Soesilo, R. (1986). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) beserta penjelasannya. Bogor: Politeia.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan mayaantara (cybercrime). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Ardan, A., DM, M. Y., & Pardede, R. (2025). LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PIMPS IN UNDERCOVER PROSTITUTION THROUGH "PLUS" MASSAGE PARLORS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.461