PROSPECTIVE LEGAL CONCEPT ON THE FULFILLMENT OF SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS FOR CONVICTED PERSONS

Authors

  • Ardi Wiyarso Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Yetti Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Anggara Putra Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.458

Keywords:

Prisoners, Financial Support, Correctional Institutions

Abstract

In many cases, prisoners serve as the primary breadwinners of their families, working to fulfill the needs of their wives and children before incarceration. When they begin serving their sentences, the families they leave behind often face severe economic hardship, which can lead to further social issues such as poverty, school dropouts, and even divorce. Although correctional institutions currently offer work training programs for inmates, these programs are generally not designed as productive work systems that guarantee fair wages or enable inmates to financially support their families. In cases where wages are provided, they are often symbolic or extremely minimal, with no systematic regulation within the national legal framework. Therefore, a legal breakthrough is needed in the form of regulation that affirms the rights of prisoners to work, receive fair compensation, and allocate their earnings to fulfill their family obligations. This study aims to analyze the concept of legal regulation concerning the obligation of prisoners to provide financial support, as well as to identify legal obstacles to the implementation of this obligation. The research method used is normative legal research. The findings indicate that the legal concept regarding the obligation of inmates to provide financial support remains largely unregulated under Indonesian law. Although prisoners retain responsibilities as heads of households, there is no binding legal mechanism requiring them to support their families during incarceration. While some correctional facilities offer work training and handicraft production programs, there is no structured system linking the income generated to the legal obligation of supporting their families. This highlights the urgent need for more operational, progressive, and socially just legal regulations. The legal perspective on the obligation of inmates to provide support holds that incarceration does not nullify this duty. Both marriage law and the Compilation of Islamic Law continue to require husbands or parents to provide financial support. However, there are currently no specific norms or provisions in Indonesian positive law that directly regulate or enforce this obligation in the context of incarceration. As a result, the families of inmates often lose their primary source of income without adequate legal protection. An ideal legal framework should align inmates’ rights as correctional residents with their social obligations as family heads, materialized through fair and responsive legal arrangements that reflect social realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Zainal. (1993). Kumpulan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Cet III. Yayasan al-Hikmah.

Akbar. (2019). Pemenuhan Hak Narapidana Memperoleh Pelatihan Kerja Dan Upah Atas Pekerjaan Yang Layak. Al-Azhar Islamic Law Review, 1(2).

Arif, M., Syaikhul, et al. (2022). Nafkah dan Problematika Keluarga. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(2).

Aziz, Umar Abdul; Baehaqi, B.; & Sarjono, Joko. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pemenuhan Nafkah Bagi Suami Narapidana Terhadap Keluarga (Studi Kasus Narapidana Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Wonogiri). Al-Hukmu: Journal of Islamic Law and Economics.

Departemen Agama RI. (2005). Membina Keluarga Sakinah. Direktorat Urusan Agama Islam.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.

Fatimah; Adawiyah, Rabiatul; & Rifqi, M. (2014, Mei). Pemenuhan Hak Istri dan Anak Akibat Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Banjarmasin). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 4(7).

Firdaus, et al. (2020). Peran Perempuan Dalam Pemenuhan Nafkah Keluarga. Jurnal Kajian dan Pengembangan Umat, 3(2).

Fitriana, Devy, et al. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Dalam Nikah Siri Korban KDRT (Studi di Desa Negaranabung Kecamatan Sukadana Kabupaten Lampung Timur). Bulletin of Islamic Law, 1(2).

Hadaiyatullah, Syeh Sarip, et al. (2024). Rekontekstualisasi Fikih Keluarga di Era Modern: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Tunisia, dan Turki. Moderasi: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(2).

Hamzani, Achmad Irwan. (2010). Pembagian Peran Suami Isteri Dalam Keluarga Islam Indonesia (Analisis Gender Terhadap Inpres No. 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam). Sosekhum, 6(9).

Hamzah, Andi. (2005). Kamus Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Hartawati, Andi; Beddu, Sumiati; & Susanti, Elvi. (2022). Model Mediasi Dalam Meningkatkan Keberhasilan Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 4(1).

Hasan, M. Ali. (1996). Masa’il Fiqhiyah Al Haditsah pada Masalah Kontemporer Hukum Islam. Cet-1. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Huda, Muhammad Nurul; & Munib, Abdul. (2022). Kompilasi Tujuan Perkawinan Dalam Hukum Positif, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Voice Justitia, 6(2).

Iksan, Adnan; & Khairunnisa. (2020, Januari). Perlindungan Anak Pasca Perceraian Orang Tua. Jurnal Fundamental, 9(1).

Karim, Muslim Abdul. (2007). Keistimewaan Nafkah Suami & Kewajiban Istri. Bintaro Jaya Sektor IX.

Karimuddin, Karimuddin, et al. (2021). Standardisasi Nafkah Istri: Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Maliki dan Mazhab Syafi’i. Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 23(1).

Kewajiban Suami Yang Berstatus Narapidana Dalam Menafkahi Keluarga Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Pekanbaru). (2021).

Lekahena, Putri Deborah, et al. (2024). Dinamika Nafkah Narapidana untuk Keluarga: Analisis Studi Kasus di Lapas Kelas IIA Permisan Nusakambangan. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 2(1).

Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. (2002). Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab-Indonesia. Pustaka.

Mustamu, Julista. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pemerintah. SASI Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura Ambon, 20(2).

Nazam, Fahrozi, et al. (2024). Peran P3AP2KB Kabupaten Lampung Timur Dalam Memediasi Kasus KDRT Dan Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Hak Perempuan. Bulletin of Islamic Law, 1(1).

Nurlaelawati, Euis. (2010). Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in The Indonesian Religious Courts. University Press.

Nurmayani. (2009). Hukum Administrasi Daerah. Universitas Lampung. (Mengutip Bagir Manan).

Nuroniyah, Wardah; Bustomi, Ilham; & Nurfadilah, Ahmad. (2019). Kewajiban Nafkah Dalam Keluarga Perspektif Husein Muhammad. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4(1).

Panjaitan, Petrus Irwan; & Simorangkir, Pandapotan. (1995). Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Poernomo, Bambang. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Priyatno, Dwidja. (2013). Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ramulio, M. Idris. (2002). Hukum Perkawinan Islam. Bumi Aksara.

Sabiq, Sayyid. (2007). Fiqih Sunnah. Terj. Nor Hasanuddin et al. Cet II. Pena Pundi Aksara.

Satriah, Lilis. (2018). Bimbingan Konseling Keluarga. Fokus Media.

Siahaan, Alfian Crisman; Harahap, Sarga Utama; & Rizki, Rizki. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Tingginya Angka Perceraian Narapidana Yang Menjalankan Masa Hukuman Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Medan. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(4).

Thayib, Anshari. (1991). Struktur Rumah Tangga Islam. Risalah Gusti.

Tim Redaksi Nuansa Aulia. (2009). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. CV. Nuansa Aulia.

Utami, Penny Naluria. (2017). Keadilan Bagi Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure, 17(3).

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Wiyarso, A., Yetti, & Putra, A. (2025). PROSPECTIVE LEGAL CONCEPT ON THE FULFILLMENT OF SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS FOR CONVICTED PERSONS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(3), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.458