THE ROLE OF PTUN IN ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS' RIGHTS

Authors

  • Timbo Mangaranap Sirait Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Khalimi Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Liza Widjaja Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.430

Keywords:

State Administration, Beschikking, Administrative Court, Dispute

Abstract

In line with developments in science and sociology in society, there are currently many disputes related to state administrative law between state administrative agencies/officials and the community. This article will discuss decisions made by state administrative agencies or officials that are considered to have harmed the interests of the community in legal terms. The research method used is normative jurisprudence through literature study and case study. Primary data was obtained from official copies of decisions from the Supreme Court Decision Directory, while secondary data consisted of relevant administrative law literature and scientific articles. The research questions are: 1) What is the background of the administrative dispute between the State Administrative Body and the Business Entity in the Jakarta Administrative Court Decision No. 425/G/2024/PTUN/Jakarta? 2) What are the implications of this decision for future administrative practices in government (Ius Constituendum)? The findings and conclusions are as follows: First, the background of the administrative dispute in this case is related to an administrative decision (Beschikking) issued by the BKPM, which was deemed detrimental to the legal interests of PT. Global Akses Sinergi, according to the Indonesian legal system, as regulated by the Administrative Court. Second, this decision will contribute to the development of Indonesian administrative law toward the creation of better and more transparent law in the future (Ius Constituendum).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Damanik, R. (2023). Diskresi administrasi dan batasannya menurut hukum administrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De Jure, 15(1), 40–53.

Djatmiko, B. (2020). Hukum administrasi dan penegakan etika pemerintahan. Jakarta: Obor Indonesia.

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Hadjon, P. M., et al. (2010). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Harahap, M. Y. (2011). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Kelsen, H. (2006). Teori hukum murni. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Lubis, A. (2023). Ius constituendum dan peran putusan pengadilan dalam pembaruan hukum. Jurnal Hukum Aktual, 10(2), 101–117.

Manan, B. (1993). Hukum positif Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Marbun, S. F. (1999). Peradilan administrasi negara dan upaya administratif di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muchsan. (2004). Pengantar hukum administrasi negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Nugroho, R. (2020). PTUN sebagai instrumen perlindungan hukum dalam tata kelola pemerintahan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 9(2), 98–112.

Nurtjahyo, H. (2013). Pengantar hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta. (2024). Putusan Nomor 425/G/2024/PTUN.JKT. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id

Prakoso, D. (1993). Sistem hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum progresif: Hukum yang membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas.

Rahmawati, I. (2020). Urgensi AUPB dalam putusan tata usaha negara. Jurnal Yuridis, 13(3), 90–103.

Ridwan HR. (2009). Hukum administrasi negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Safitri, M. (2022). Penguatan fungsi yudisial PTUN dalam reformasi administrasi negara. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Hukum, 14(3), 134–149.

Siagian, S. P. (2003). Administrasi pembangunan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sirait, T. M. (2021). Ilmu politik hukum dari masa ke masa. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Soehino. (1982). Ilmu negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Wahyudi, I. (2015). Tanggung jawab pemerintah dalam perspektif hukum administrasi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Widjaja, H. A. (2000). Otonomi daerah dan daerah otonom. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wulandari, S. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap badan usaha melalui PTUN. Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi, 7(4), 66–80.

Yulianti, E. (2021). Pengawasan administratif oleh PTUN dalam sistem pemerintahan modern. Jurnal Hukum dan Pemerintahan, 8(1), 12–24.

Zainal, A. (2022). Reformasi regulasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(2), 33–45.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

Sirait, T. M., Khalimi, & Widjaja, L. (2025). THE ROLE OF PTUN IN ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS’ RIGHTS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(3), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.430