THE STRENGTH OF PHOTOCOPY EVIDENCE OF AUTHENTIC DEEDS IN JOINT PROPERTY DISPUTES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.420Keywords:
Authentic Deed, Marital Property, ProofAbstract
Marriage is a physical and spiritual bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy family. In practice, not all marriages go according to plan, so divorce is a legal solution recognized by the state. Divorce not only affects the relationship between husband and wife but also causes disputes regarding the division of marital property. Marital property is joint property obtained during marriage and must be divided fairly after divorce. The legal process in court submits authentic evidence that has an important role in proving ownership of the division of marital property. Authentic evidence has higher legal force than other evidence so that it can provide legal certainty for the disputing parties. In addition, inconsistencies in evidence can cause a court decision to be detrimental to one of the parties because the evidence must ensure the validity of legal documents. As in dispute Number 1176 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PA.Lmj, the plaintiff submitted imitation authentic evidence in the trial process. This research method uses a normative legal research type using a case approach, a conceptual approach, and a statutory approach with a study of primary and secondary legal materials. The conclusion of this analysis is that the fake deed shown by the plaintiff does not have perfect evidentiary power because it is considered not attached to the deed itself, whereas in the Ratio legis as a reason for considering the judge's decision regarding the strength of authentic evidence, this fake can help the judge to make a fair decision based on the actual facts and provide legal certainty regarding the validity of the deed that is the object of the dispute.
Downloads
References
Achmad, Y., & Mukti Fajar. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Al, H. M. A., & Handoko, W. (2023). Rasio legis perbuatan tercela sebagai dasar pemberhentian sementara pejabat pembuat akta tanah. Jurnal, 16, 998–1012.
Anam, S., & Partners. (2013). Peradilan konstitusi di sepuluh negara. www.saplaw.top
Anas, F., Fathurrahman, A., & Humaidi, K. (2021). Rasio legis dispensasi usia perkawinan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan. Jurnal Hikmatina, 3(3), 261–268.
Askarial. (2018). Interpretasi atau penafsiran sebagai metode penemuan hukum. Menara Ilmu, 12(2), 79.
Burgerlijk Wetboek (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata).
Damanik, M. I. L., & Lubis, F. (2024). Arti pentingnya pembuktian. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 74–81.
Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR).
Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori & metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Ilhami, M. W., Nurfajriani, W. V., Mahendra, A., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Penerapan metode studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(9), 462–469.
Ii, B. A. B., & A Disparitas. (2020). Bab II disparitas dalam proses peradilan (pp. 13–42).
Juanda, E. (1998). Kekuatan alat bukti dalam perkara perdata menurut hukum positif Indonesia. Jurnal, 27–46.
LPPM UMSB. (2016). MENARA Ilmu Vol. X Jilid 1 No.70 September 2016. Menara Ilmu, 10(70), 15–22.
Naimah, N. (2015). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak kesehatan reproduksi perempuan dari kekerasan berbasis gender. Egalita, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18860/egalita.v10i1.4538
Oleh, H. S. B., & Beberapa Teori Pembuktian. (2012). [Tanpa judul].
Ratnaningsih, & Sudjatmiko. (2021). Menakar nilai keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum pencegah perkawinan anak. Jurnal, 5, 50–66.
Septianingsih, K. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2020). Kekuatan alat bukti akta otentik dalam pembuktian perkara perdata. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2584.336-340
Siregar, R. L. (2021). Memahami tentang model, strategi, metode, pendekatan, teknik, dan taktik. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 63–75.
Sitorus, E. T., Samosir, M., & Nainggolan, R. P. (2025). Studi kasus putusan pengadilan pajak nomor. Jurnal, 6(2), 72–85.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Yani, A. (2018). Sistem pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan teori dan praktek konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 12(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.119-135
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Disti Anggun Saputri, Ratnaningsih, Naimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
