Zero Fraud Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v6i1.380Keywords:
Zero Fraud, Employee Performance, Fraud Prevention, Risk Management, SWOT AnalysisAbstract
This study analyzes the implementation of the Zero Fraud Program in reducing fraud rates and its impact on employee performance at PT Usaha Garda Arta, Depok Branch. This study uses a qualitative approach with interview methods, observation, and document analysis of five key informants. SWOT analysis is used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of this program. The results of the study indicate that the Zero Fraud Program is effective in reducing fraud rates through strict supervision, anti-fraud fires, and ongoing training. However, there are still obstacles such as limited technology, minimal management involvement, and employee resistance to change. Although this program is able to reduce fraud cases, problems such as high absenteeism, low work motivation, and lack of employee understanding of anti-fraud policies are still obstacles to improving performance. This program has a positive impact on productivity, time efficiency, and work quality, but it needs improvement in technology integration, increasing policy transparency, and communication between management and employees. This study recommends the implementation of a more comprehensive fraud prevention framework, increasing management participation, and performance-based incentive training, and developing an integrity-based work culture will increase the effectiveness of fraud prevention in the long term.
Downloads
References
Ansor, A. (2009). Analysis of the Effect of ROA, PBV, EPS, PER, Exchange Rates, and Interest Rates on Stock Returns (Empirical Study on Manufacturing Companies Listed on IDX 2006-2008). [Master’s thesis, Diponegoro University].
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to the Nations: Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. ACFE Publishing.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2002). Investments. McGraw Hill.
Brav, A., & Heaton, J. B. (2002). Competing theories of financial anomalies. Review of Financial Studies, 15(3), 575–606.
Campbell, R. H., Lins, K. V., & Roper, A. H. (2004). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 445−460.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. New York: Free Press.
COSO. (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations.
Ghozali, I. (2021). The role of internal control systems in preventing corporate fraud: A case study. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 12(1), 25-40.
Hasibuan, M. (2021). The impact of corporate fraud prevention on employee motivation and engagement. Journal of Financial Integrity, 18(4), 312-328.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sugiyono. (2017). Qualitative, Quantitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.