EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CONSIGNMENT MECHANISM IN CREATING LEGAL CERTAINTY IN LAND ACQUISITION FOR PUBLIC INTERESTS

Authors

  • Junpiter Tambun Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Yalid Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Indra Afrita Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.752

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Consignment, Land Acquisition

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the consignment mechanism in land acquisition for public interest in the construction of the Balairaja Toll Gate, Bengkalis Regency, based on the principles of legal certainty and protection of land rights, and to reconstruct a more ideal consignment mechanism. The study used sociological legal methods. The results indicate that consignment provides legal certainty for the government in continuing development when compensation is refused or land rights are disputed. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, such as suboptimal deliberation, lack of transparency in compensation assessments, limited community participation, and the tendency to use consignment as an instrument for accelerating development. This situation has resulted in a balance between legal certainty, justice, and the protection of community rights that has not been fully realized. Therefore, reconstruction of the consignment mechanism is necessary by strengthening the deliberation function, increasing transparency and accountability in assessments, providing opportunities for comparative assessments (second appraisals), placing consignment as a last resort (ultimum remedium), strengthening oversight by the District Court, and improving the provisions in Law Number 2 of 2012 and its implementing regulations. This reconstruction is expected to achieve a balance between national development interests and the protection of community constitutional rights in accordance with the principles of a democratic state based on the rule of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. (2014). Legal certainty and justice in court decisions. Judicial Journal, 7(2).

Amriani, N. (2016). Land dispute resolution model through mediation. Fiat Justisia Journal, 10(2).

Arisaputra, M. I. (2015). Problems of land acquisition for public interest in indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 4(1).

Arizona, Y. (2018). State recognition of community rights to land. Jurnal Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 4(1).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). The idea of the Indonesian legal state. IUS QUIA IUSTUM Law Journal, 17(3).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Introduction to constitutional law. Rajawali Pers.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Legal protection for the Indonesian people. Airlangga University Law Journal, 2(1).

Hamidah, S. (2021). Access to justice in land dispute resolution. Judicial Journal, 14(1).

Harsono, B. (2008). Indonesian agrarian law: History of the formation of the basic agrarian law, its contents and implementation (Revised ed.). Djambatan. (Catatan: Diurutkan berdasarkan tahun terlama untuk penulis yang sama)

Harsono, B. (2018). Indonesian agrarian law: History of the formation of the basic agrarian law, its contents, and implementation. Djambatan.

Heryandi. (2019). Consignment in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 8(2).

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Achieving legal certainty through law enforcement. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 21(3).

Radbruch, G. (2013). Legal theory: Strategies for human order across space and generations. Dalam B. L. Tanya, Y. N. Simanjuntak, & M. Y. Hage, Legal theory: Strategies for human order across space and generations. Genta Publishing.

Rahardjo, S. (2005). Progressive law: Law that liberates. Progressive Law Journal, 1(1).

Rahardjo, S. (2017). Legal studies. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmadi, T. (2013). Dispute resolution through alternative approaches (alternative dispute resolution). Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 25(1).

Santoso, U. (2017). Agrarian law: A comprehensive study. Kencana.

Soekanto, S. (2019). Factors influencing law enforcement. Rajawali Pers.

Sumardjono, M. S. (2008). Land in the perspective of economic, social, and cultural rights. Kompas.

Sumardjono, M. S. (2015). Land policy between regulation and implementation. Jurnal Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 1(1).

Sumardjono, M. S. (2019). Land policy between regulation and implementation. Kompas.

Sutedi, A. (2020). Implementation of the public interest principle in land acquisition for development. Sinar Grafika.

Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, Markus. Y. (2013). Legal theory: Strategies for human order across space and generations. Genta Publishing.

Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, Markus. Y. (2016). The concept of legal certainty in Gustav Radbruch’s perspective. Jurnal Yustisia, 5(2).

Usman, R. (2014). Alternative dispute resolution in the perspective of Indonesian law. IUS QUIA IUSTUM Law Journal, 21(3).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Tambun, J., Yalid, & Afrita, I. (2026). EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CONSIGNMENT MECHANISM IN CREATING LEGAL CERTAINTY IN LAND ACQUISITION FOR PUBLIC INTERESTS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(2), 572–592. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.752