IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGED ROADS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.746Keywords:
Implementation, Responsibility, Damaged RoadsAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of local government responsibility for damaged roads in Tapung Hulu District, Kampar Regency, to analyze the obstacles in the implementation of local government responsibility for damaged roads in Tapung Hulu District, Kampar Regency, and to analyze efforts to overcome obstacles in the implementation of local government responsibility for damaged roads in Tapung Hulu District, Kampar Regency. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the implementation of local government responsibility for damaged roads in Tapung Hulu District, Kampar Regency has not been running optimally because there are still road sections that have been damaged for a relatively long time, thus affecting the safety of road users, the smooth mobility of the community, and economic activities. This condition indicates that the implementation of local government obligations has not fully met the principles of implementing safe, secure, sustainable roads and providing quality public services as mandated by laws and regulations. The obstacles are: First, limited regional financial capacity causes the budget for road maintenance and improvement to not be able to meet all the needs for road infrastructure development. Second, the weak road monitoring and maintenance system causes minor damage not to be immediately addressed so that it develops into severe damage that requires greater rehabilitation costs. Third, the less than optimal implementation of criminal liability against road operators who neglect to carry out their obligations as stipulated in Article 24 and Article 273 of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, so that the preventive function of criminal law has not provided a deterrent effect in increasing compliance of road operators with their legal obligations.
Downloads
References
Chazawi, A. (2022). Pelajaran hukum pidana bagian I. Rajawali Pers.
Fitri, H. T. (2012). Perlindungan konsumen bagi pengguna jalan ditinjau dari perspektif Undang-Undang Jalan yang memiliki hubungan komplementer dengan Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan serta Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen [Tesis magister, Universitas Indonesia].
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2020). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana (Edisi revisi). Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Indroharto. (2000). Usaha memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (2019). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi dan manajemen keuangan daerah. Andi Offset.
Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana (Edisi ke-9). Rineka Cipta.
Muchsan. (2007). Sistem pengawasan terhadap perbuatan aparat pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Liberty.
Ridwan, H. R. (2016). Hukum administrasi negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Ridwan, H. R. (2020). Hukum administrasi negara (Edisi revisi). Rajawali Pers.
Rusianto, A. (2018). Tindak pidana dan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Kencana.
Sianturi, S. R. (2016). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia dan penerapannya. Alumni AHAEM-PETEHAEM.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum (Edisi ke-1, cet. ke-18). Rajawali Pers.
Tjahjono, T., & Subagio, I. (2011). Analisis keselamatan lalu lintas jalan. Lubuk Agung.
Tjandra, W. R. (2018). Hukum administrasi negara. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zulkarnaini, Irawan Harahap, Miftahul Haq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
