LEGAL PROTECTION FOR COMPANIES HOLDING CERTIFICATES OF CULTIVATION RIGHTS
Keywords:
Land Use Rights, Investment, Legal Certainty, Legal Protection, UUPAAbstract
The legal vulnerabilities faced by holders of Land Use Rights (HGU) certificates, particularly those related to the phenomenon of land occupation by third parties and administrative obstacles in renewing rights, have the potential to harm the investment climate. This study aims to analyze legal protection efforts for companies holding HGU certificates based on Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations (UUPA) and examine legal certainty in the process of extending HGU certificates to ensure investment sustainability. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach through an analysis of Case Decision Number 90/Pdt.G/2024/PN Kis. HGU certificates provide preventive legal protection as a strong means of evidence, but in practice, repressive protection still faces obstacles in execution and judges’ interpretation of the social function of land. Legal certainty in HGU extensions is a crucial pillar for the sustainability of corporate investment, where the state is obliged to guarantee the stability of land ownership for rights holders who have fulfilled their constitutional obligations. This study recommends the need for synchronization of land regulations to simplify the bureaucracy of land use rights renewal in order to minimize agrarian disputes in the future.
Downloads
References
Amasta, A. W., & Paulus, R. S. (2024). Penerapan Asas Fungsi Sosial Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Putusan nomor 28/G/PU/2019/PTUN. PBR. The Juris, 8(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1187
Asadi, S. (2024). Eksistensi Hak Guna Usaha (HGU) terhadap Tanah Negara dalam Perspektif Keadilan Agraria:-. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 3(5), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i5.1577
Asmin, B. A. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Ahli Waris atas Tanah Eks HGU Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6381 K/Pdt/2025. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.3442
Ayuningtyas, T. R., Septiana, N. L. I., Rizki, A. S. B., Rohmah, I. A., & Sarmila, M. (2024). Analisa Hukum Terhadap Pengaturan Hak Guna Usaha di Ibu Kota Negara. Unes Law Review, 6(4), 11766-11776. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2149
Hasanah, A. U., Fahmi, R. F. M., Andiatna, N. B., Rahmawati, S., & Komala, D. Z. (2026). Pengakuan Hak Ulayat Tanah Baduy dalam Lintasan Sejarah: Kolonialisme (Agrarische Wet) Menuju Kebijakan Perda. Jurnal Artefak, 13(1), 69-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ja.v13i1.22439
Herwansyah, H. (2025). Analisis Dampak Kehadiran Hak Pengelolaan (HPL) bagi Tanah Ulayat MasyarakatAdat Pasca Disahkannya UU Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 6(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v6i2.5119
Irawan, R. A., Setyawan, F., & Ali, M. (2023). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Penertiban Dan Pendayagunaan Tanah-Tanah Terlantar. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 308-329. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2023.v3i1.308-329
Monding, J. G., Ramaino, A. S., & Pelealu, A. E. (2026). AGRARISCHE WET 1870: Amandemen Menjadi Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Nomor 5 Tahun 1960. Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum, 3(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.64924/8qsgwe28
Novandana, M. R., & Setiawati, N. A. (2026). Making Land Leaseable: Woeste Gronden and the Genealogy of Colonial Agrarian Governance in Priangan (1830–1870). Diakronika, 26(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.24036/diakronika/vol26-iss1/519
Nuridah, I., & Rakhmanto, B. (2026). A Critical View of the De Locomotief Newspaper on Laborers in Java 1864-1870: Pandangan Kritis Koran De Locomotief Terhadap Buruh di Jawa 1864-1870. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 10(1), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v10i1.7131
Rahim, A., & Hanifah, I. (2024). Peran Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pembatasan Pemilikan Tanah Hak Guna Usaha Kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pengabdian Pencerahan Bangsa, 2(1). https://jurnal.mediapencerahanbangsa.co.id/index.php/ppb/article/view/140
Ramadhan, A. R., Muntaqo, F., & Rumesten, I. (2022). Penertiban tanah terlantar dalam rangka penatagunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1799
Rosmidah, R., Hosen, M., & Sasmiar, S. (2023). Penataan struktur hukum hak atas tanah dalam rangka keadilan dan investasi. Recital Review, 5(2), 209-244. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v5i2.28387
Satrianty, A., & Maulisa, N. (2024). Peran Badan Bank Tanah Sebagai Land Manager Dikaitkan Dengan Fungsi Sosial Atas Tanah. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.474
Sharfinda, N. M., Antikowati, A., & Prakoso, B. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Hak Guna Usaha di atas Hak Pengelolaan. MIMBAR YUSTITIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 7(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v7i2.5060
Silviana, A., & Yunita, F. R. (2022). Uang Kerohiman Sebagai Bentuk Ganti Rugi Untuk Penggarap Tanah Tanpa Ijin Pemiliknya. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 336-363. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.336-363
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hapit Sugandi, Muh. Amin Saleh, Hotman Sinambela, Appe Hutauruk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
