RECONSTRUCTING MOBILE BRIGADE AUTHORITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS WITHIN ARMED CRIMINAL GROUP CONFLICT AREAS BASED ON LEGALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Authors

  • Amir Hasan A Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Yusuf Daeng Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Rudi Pardede Lancang Kuning University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.697

Keywords:

Reconstruction, Authority, Mobile Brigade

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the reconstruction of the authority of the Indonesian National Police Mobile Brigade in law enforcement operations in conflict-prone areas affected by armed criminal groups based on the principles of legality and human rights. The authority and assignment mechanisms of the Indonesian National Police Mobile Brigade Corps in efforts to restore regional security against armed criminal groups in conflict areas are analyzed. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the research results, it is known that the reconstruction of the authority of the Indonesian National Police Mobile Brigade in law enforcement operations in areas prone to armed criminal group conflicts based on the principles of legality and human rights is basically derived from the attribution authority granted by Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, specifically Article 13 and Article 14 which regulate the task of maintaining public security and order and law enforcement. However, these regulations are still general in nature and have not specifically regulated the authority of Brimob in dealing with armed criminal groups that have the characteristics of high-intensity threats, use modern weaponry, and apply guerrilla patterns that resemble non-international armed conflicts. This research found a legal vacuum and normative inconsistency that specifically regulates the definition of armed criminal groups, threat classification, limits of Brimob's authority, mechanisms for TNI involvement, operational command structures, standards for the use of force, and mechanisms for protecting human rights in security operations in conflict areas. Therefore, the reconstruction of Brimob's authority must be carried out through the creation of special regulations that place Brimob as the leading sector in law enforcement operations, clarify the TNI assistance mechanism, strengthen the principle of legality, and integrate human rights protection standards based on the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). The Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Introduction to Constitutional Law. Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Regarding the Law. Rajawali Pers.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Buzan, B. (2008). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Legal Protection for the People in Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Hadjon, P. M. (1992). On government authority (Bestuursbevoegdheid). Yuridika, 7(5).

Hadjon, P. M. (1997). Concerning Government Authority (Bestuursbevoegdheid). Faculty of Law, Airlangga University.

Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hadjon, P. M. (2019). Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2009). Principles of Legality and Legal Discovery in Criminal Law. Erlangga.

Juwana, H. (2006). Resolving the Aceh conflict from an international law perspective. Journal of International Law, 3(2).

Karnavian, M. T. (2008). Indonesian Top Secret: Uncovering the Poso Conflict. Gramedia.

MacIver, R. M. (1964). The Modern State. Oxford University Press.

Muladi. (2009). Human Rights in the Perspective of the Criminal Justice System. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Muladi. (2010). Human Rights and Legal Reform in Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Law and Society. Angkasa.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Progressive Law Enforcement. Kompas.

Ridwan, H. R. (2020). State Administrative Law. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ridwan, H. R. (2022). State Administrative Law. Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, S. (2018). Factors Influencing Law Enforcement. Rajawali Pers.

Stahl, F. J. (1878). Philosophie des Rechts. Mohr Siebeck.

United Nations. (1990). Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. United Nations.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2017). Handbook on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. United Nations.

Utrecht, E. (1985). Introduction to Indonesian State Administrative Law. Ichtiar Baru.

Weber, M. (1965). Politics as a Vocation. Fortress Press.

Williams, P. D. (2018). Security Studies: An Introduction. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Hasan A, A., Daeng, Y., & Pardede, R. (2026). RECONSTRUCTING MOBILE BRIGADE AUTHORITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS WITHIN ARMED CRIMINAL GROUP CONFLICT AREAS BASED ON LEGALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(3), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.697