CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INDONESIAN NATIONAL ARMED FORCES MEMBERS IN CYBER CRIME

Authors

  • Fera Kusumawati Marshal Suryadarma Aerospace University, East Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Supri Abu Marshal Suryadarma Aerospace University, East Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Diding Rahmat Marshal Suryadarma Aerospace University, East Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.623

Keywords:

TNI, Cybercrime, Criminal Accountability, ITE Law, Military Law

Abstract

The development of digital technology and the expansion of cyberspace have presented stra-tegic opportunities for the nation, but have also opened up the potential for new and increas-ingly complex crimes, including cybercrimes involving members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). As part of the national defense apparatus, TNI soldiers are subject to the national legal system when committing electronic-based unlawful acts. This study aims to examine the legal provisions for cybercrimes in the laws and regulations applicable to TNI members and to analyze the forms of criminal liability for soldiers committing digital crimes. The method used is normative juridical research with a statute approach and a case approach through a review of relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of cybercrime for TNI members is basically based on the ITE Law (Law 11/2008 jo. Law 19/2016 jo. Law 1/2024), the New Criminal Code (Law 1/2023), the Criminal Code, the Military Court Law 31/1997, and the Military Discipline Law 25/2014. However, until now there has been no norm that specifically regulates cyber-military offenses so that the potential for overlapping jurisdictions is still found, especially in the application of lex specialis KUHPM and lex generalis ITE Law. Forms of criminal liability for TNI members include individual liability, command liability, and disciplinary liability if the act does not fulfill the elements of a crime. The phenomenon of spreading hoaxes by soldiers and involvement in online gambling shows that the handling of cyber violations is still dominated by disciplinary sanctions, not criminalization. This study concludes that the lack of cyber norms within the military legal framework requires more comprehensive regulatory reform, including revising the Criminal Code (KUHPPM), aligning the ITE Law with the military justice system, and developing technical guidelines for digital evidence for soldiers involved in cybercrimes. Strengthening digital literacy, establishing data security SOPs, and clarifying jurisdictional boundaries are necessary to ensure law enforcement is fair, consistent, and in line with the principles of TNI professionalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. (2008). Problems of law enforcement and criminal policy. Kencana.

Arief, B. N. (2010). Anthology of criminal law policy. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B. N. (2016). Problems of criminal responsibility in criminal law. Pustaka Magister.

Hamzah, A. (2017). Principles of criminal law (5th ed.). Rineka Cipta.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Kurnia, D. (2022). Cyber law & digital defense. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Legal research (revised ed.). Prenada Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Normative legal research methods. Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2007). Normative legal research. Rajawali Pers.

Suhariyanto, B. (2013). Information technology crimes (cybercrime). Rajawali Pers.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Disiplin Militer.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Kusumawati, F., Abu, S., & Rahmat, D. (2026). CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INDONESIAN NATIONAL ARMED FORCES MEMBERS IN CYBER CRIME. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(3), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.623