BURDEN OF PROVING WORK ABSENCE IN OVERTIME WAGE CLAIMS

Authors

  • Nason Nadaek Awang Long School of Law, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Hambali Awang Long School of Law, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Ria Trisno Murti Awang Long School of Law, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.613

Keywords:

Burden, Evidence, Fair

Abstract

Overtime pay demands occur when a company employs its workers to work overtime, but the workers are not given overtime pay, so that the workers are forced to make a report or complaint to the labor inspector, to be examined as a basis for making calculations and determinations, because overtime pay is a right guaranteed by Article 78 paragraph (2) of Law No. 6 of 2023. In practice, overtime pay claims are very difficult to obtain, because labor inspectors who handle complaints always place the burden of proof on the workers who file complaints or demands. The main evidentiary document that must be proven in overtime pay claims is work attendance. Considering that work attendance only exists within the company, the burden of proof placed by labor inspectors on workers is the wrong burden of proof, because how can a party who does not have evidence be burdened to prove it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Harahap, M. Y. (2011). Civil Procedure Law: Concerning Lawsuits, Trials, Evidence, and Court Decisions. Sinar Grafika.

Indonesia. (1847). Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek).

Indonesia. (1951). Law No. 3 of 1951 on the Declaration of the Enactment of the Labor Inspection Law of 1948 No. 23 of the Republic of Indonesia for All Indonesia.

Indonesia. (1981). Law No. 7 of 1981 on Mandatory Labor Reporting in Companies.

Indonesia. (1997). Law No. 8 of 1997 on Corporate Documents.

Indonesia. (2004). Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement.

Indonesia. (2004). Law No. 9 of 2004 on the Amendment to Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts.

Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration.

Minister of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 33 of 2016 on Labor Inspection Procedures.

Simanjuntak, E. (2018). State Administrative Court Procedural Law (Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara). Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Nadaek, N., Hambali, A., & Murti, R. T. (2026). BURDEN OF PROVING WORK ABSENCE IN OVERTIME WAGE CLAIMS. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(2), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.613