Projection of Predatory Pricing Dispute Resolution in The Context of Business Competition Between UMKM in The Digital Economy Era Based on Win-Win Solution
Abstract
Predatory pricing disputes between UMKM have been in the public spotlight since the alleged practice of predatory pricing by UMKM businesses selling through the Tik-Tok Shop application. UMKM players in the Jakarta Tanah Abang Market suffered losses due to lack of visitors because the products sold through the Tik-Tok Shop application were twice as cheap. Government policy by modifying the Regulation of the Minister of Trade as a responsive effort in anticipating Predatory Pricing disputes, instead causing losses to Tik-Tok Shop UMKM actors. This research aims to analyze the regulation of Predatory Pricing dispute settlement on business competition practices among UMKM, as well as to offer ideas on the projection of Predatory Pricing dispute settlement on business competition practices among UMKM based on win-win solution. This is a normative research, with statutory, conceptual and comparative law approaches, and analyzed perscriptively. The results of this research show that, First, the Law on Business Competition and Anti-Monopoly, the Law on UMKM, the Law on Trade and the Regulation of the Minister of Trade on PMSE have not regulated the dispute settlement of Predatory Pricing practices in the context of Business Competition between UMKM. Second, the projection of Predatory Pricing dispute settlement in business competition among UMKM must be done by optimizing out-of-court settlements, involving the role of UMKM organizations in Indonesia, assessing with the Rule of Reason approach, and containing business competition dispute settlement norms in the UMKM Law.
Downloads
References
Komarudin, A. (2014). Integrative Legal Politics of UMKMs: State Policy to Make UMKMs Advanced and Competitive. Jakarta: RMBOOKS.
Sunggono, B. (2015). Legal Research Methodology, Cet. V. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sonata, D. L. (2014). Normative and Empirical Legal Research Methods: Distinctive Characteristics of Legal Research Methods. Fiat Justitia Journal of Legal Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, January-March, 25.
Irwansyah. (2021). Legal Research: Choice of Methods and Practice of Article Writing, Revised Edition. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media.
Nazhari, A. F. (2023). Analysis of Alleged Predatory Pricing Practices and Abuse of Dominant Position in the E-Commerce Industry. Journal of Business Competition, Vol. 3, No. 1, 21.
Rokan, M. K. (2012). Business Competition Law: Theory and Practice in Indonesia, Mold 2. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Darmawan, V., & Wiradiputra, D. (2022). Predatory Pricing in E-Commerce from the Perspective of Business Competition Law. Journal of Social Science and Education (JISIP), Vol. 6, No. 3, July, 9847.
Yusuf. (November 2023, Monday, 15:48 Wita). Government Encourages Increased Digitalization of UMKMs and Creative Enterprises. Retrieved from www.kominfo.go.id.
Himawan, F., & Tri Anggraini, A. M. (2023). Comparison of Predatory Pricing Implementation According to Indonesian and United States Competition Law. Journal of Trisakti Law Reform, Vol. 5, No. 3, August, 692.
Sitorus, A. P. (2018). Legal Politics of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM) Protection in the Asean Economic Community. Doctrina: Journal of Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, October, 130.
Pimoljinda, & Siriprasertchok. (2018). SMEs development and ASEAN economic integration: An analysis of Singapore and Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 26, No. 1, 510.
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2023, November, Monday at 18:45 Wita). Tik-Tok CEO Meets Minister of Trade, Shou Zi Chew: Tik-Tok Shop Used by 2 Million UMKMs. Retrieved from www.kemendag.go.id.
Evangeulista, G., Agustin, A., Edy Putra, G. P., Pramesti, D. T., & Madiistriyatno, H. (2023). UMKM Strategy in Facing Digitalization. Oikos-Nomos: Journal of Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1, June, 38.
Ayodya, W. (2022). UMKM 4.0: UMKM Strategies for Entering the Digital Age. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2023, November Thursday at 09:30 Wita). Press Release: Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019: Government Regulation on Electronic Commerce. Retrieved from www.kemendag.go.id.
Zain, I. I., & Haerani. (2024). Alternative Dispute Resolution Between Consumers and UMKM Business Actors Through the Mataram City Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency. Journal of Justisi, Vol. 10, No. 1, January, 39.
Sobarna, A. (2002). Win-Win Solution Approach in Overcoming International Terrorism: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Pulpit, Vol. XVIII, No. 4, October-December, 386.
Wahyuni, D. (2015). Negotiation Process in Cooperation between PT Arina Mahakarya and PT Rama Indonesia. Scientific Journal of Communication Sciences, Vol. XIV, No. 2, , 179.
Helmi (2018). Business Dispute Resolution Through Mediation. Unram Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 6.
Tektona, R. I. (2011). Arbitration as an Alternative Solution to Settle Business Disputes Outside the Court. Pandecta Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, January, 89- 90.
Albar, A. A. (2019). Dynamics of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Context of International Business Law. Authentic's: Journal of Kenotariatan Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, January, P-ISSN2655-5131, 22.
Meseroll, B. K., Apatov, N. M., & Rutledge, C. M. (2015). The Noncompete Clause and the Nurse Anethetist: an Assessment of Knowledge, Perception, and Experience. AANA Journal, 83, 5, October, 330.
Bork, R. H. (1965). The Rule Of Reason And Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division. The Yale Law Journal, 74, 5, April, 785.
Supianto. (2013). Per Se Illegal and Rule of Reason in Indonesian Competition Law. Rechtens Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, June, 51.
Sitorus, A. P. (2018). Legal Politics of Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises (UMKM) Protection in the Asean Economic Community. Doctrina: Journal of Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, October, 130
Copyright (c) 2024 Melki T. Tunggati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
