Legal Protection for Corruption Crime Reporters (Whistle Blower) in Bandung High Court Decision Number: 32/PID.TPK/2022/PT BDG

Authors

  • Muhamad Maulana Yusup Universitas Kristen Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.175

Abstract

Legal protection for reporting witnesses in criminal acts of corruption is part of and protects human rights, because witnesses in corruption cases are considered community participation to reveal criminal acts that are very detrimental to the state, so that the state has an obligation to protect the human rights of its citizens, will However, many people do not want/reluctant to become witnesses, for the reason that there is no clear legal protection, especially for witnesses reporting criminal acts of corruption. The role of someone who reports actions around them, especially within the agency where they work, or what is known as a whistle blower is very important in efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. Therefore, the whistle blowing system must continue to be improved starting from the rules and implementation. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical research, namely analyzing written law, library materials and document studies are used as the main material while field data through interviews is used as supporting/complementary data. Data Analysis, after all secondary data has been obtained through library research, as well as supporting data from interviews, examination and evaluation are carried out to determine its validity, then the data is grouped into similar data. Qualitative data is interpreted juridically, logically, systematically using deductive and inductive methods. Indonesians are still afraid to become whistle blowers, because there are many risks that must be faced, and are even difficult to avoid. Threats of demotion, suspension, even firing, will occur. In fact, reporting someone related to a corruption case to law enforcement officials could also be dangerous for him. Therefore, it is necessary to provide legal protection for whistle blowers so that people are not afraid to become whistle blowers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. Law Enforcement Issues and Criminal Law Policy in Combating Crime. Jakarta: Kencana Prena Media Group. 2007

A. Hamzah, Corruption Problems and Solutions in Indonesia, Jakarta, Gramedia, 1984

A. Hamzah, Eradicating Corruption Through National and International Criminal Law, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005

Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, Fair Order, Problematics of Legal Philosophy. Jakarta: Grassindo, 1999

Emon Makarim, Compilation of Telematics Law. Jakarta: PT. Grafindi Persada, 2003

Guide to Thesis Writing Techniques, Indonesian Christian University 2022/2023

Hamzah, AKUHP & KUHAP (Revised). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2013

Hutasoit, T. Becoming a Police Officer that the People Trust (Stages of the National Police Reform Journey). South. Hasanuddin University Makassar. 2004

H. Salim HS & Erlies Septiana Nurbani (1). Application of Legal Theory in Thesis and Research, First Book, PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Depok. 2017

Kuba, S. Optimizing Law Enforcement Against Conventional Crimes by the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in the Sulawesi Region. 2009

Laden Marpaung, Corruption Crime Problems and Solutions, Jakarta, Sinar Grafa, 1992

Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes

MADE RISA SUTIADEWI YOHANES USFUNAN URGES Legal Protection for Whistle Blower in Corruption Crime Case Trials.

Muhadar. Witness and Victim Protection in the Criminal Justice System. Surabaya. 2010

Saulus Suradi. Legal Protection for Reporting Witnesses in Corruption Crimes is Linked to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-22

How to Cite

Muhamad Maulana Yusup. (2023). Legal Protection for Corruption Crime Reporters (Whistle Blower) in Bandung High Court Decision Number: 32/PID.TPK/2022/PT BDG. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 5(1), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.175